THIRD WORLD WAR  第三次世界大战  ТРЕТЬЯ МИРОВАЯ ВОЙНА 

Home » 2026 » November » 12 » G20 Without a Group Photo - Diplomacy on the Edge of Ritual

---

9:00 AM G20 Without a Group Photo - Diplomacy on the Edge of Ritual

The G20 foreign ministers meeting in Atlanta occurred without the customary group photo, as several European ministers refused to stand alongside Sergey Lavrov, who is under EU sanctions. This cancellation reflects deeper issues about the functionality of the G20 as a platform for dialogue during disagreements.<p class="ql-align-justify">The G20 foreign ministers meeting in Atlanta took place without the key ritual of such summits — the group photo. The reason is simple and telling: several European ministers declined to stand next to Sergey Lavrov, who is under EU sanctions. The organizers chose to cancel the photo rather than record a public schism. It may seem like a small gesture, but it raises the question of whether the platform created specifically for dialogue during disagreements still functions.</p><h2>The Photo That Wasn't There</h2><p class="ql-align-justify">The tradition of the “family portrait” of leaders and ministers has developed over decades as a visual formula: despite disagreements, the parties remain in the same space and under the same protocol. To refuse it is not just a matter of etiquette. It sends a signal to voters back home: “we do not legitimize Moscow's presence.” It also sends a message to the G20 format itself: some participants are no longer willing to pretend that the meeting is happening within the old diplomatic logic.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">At the same time, Lavrov did attend, spoke, and held bilateral negotiations. There was no complete isolation — and there couldn’t be: BRICS countries, Global South states, and a significant part of Asia and Africa continue to engage with Russia at the ministerial level. The photo may have been canceled, but the conversations continue. This offers an accurate portrait of today’s world: divided but not yet completely torn apart.</p><h2>Three Lines of Division</h2><p class="ql-align-justify">The meeting's agenda includes three crises that divide the room along different axes. The war in Ukraine remains the main irritant between Russia and Western capitals. Military activities surrounding Iran and shipping disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz affect the global economy and raise uncomfortable questions for those who simultaneously demand a “rules-based order” while supporting actions that undermine that order. Finally, the topics of food and energy security are increasingly highlighted by the Global South, which is proclaiming that sanctions hit it harder than the stated targets.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">In this configuration, any joint communiqué becomes a complex linguistic compromise. The refusal of the group photo is also an indirect acknowledgment: even at the symbolic level, it has become harder to reach agreements than at the level of formulations.</p><h2>What Is Lost When Protocol Falls Silent</h2><p class="ql-align-justify">The G20 format was originally created not for demonstrating unity, but for managing disagreements. That is why it brought together countries with incompatible political systems and opposing interests. If it loses its ability to exist in the same room — it remains only a platform for parallel monologues. And as history from the 20th century shows, monologues rarely end in peace.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">The issue is not that European ministers feel a moral aversion — that is understandable. The problem is that the refusal of dialogue symbols does not bring us closer to ending the war in Ukraine or de-escalating the situation surrounding Iran. It merely confirms that the tools for conversation are diminishing while conflicts are increasing.</p><h2>A Clear-Eyed Perspective</h2><p class="ql-align-justify">Criticizing Moscow for the war and demanding its end is the right and duty of many governments. But diplomacy is not a reward for good behavior; it’s a survival technique. History shows that the most difficult agreements were made with those with whom it was undesirable to stand next to in a photo. If platforms for such contacts shrink to the size of bilateral corridor meetings, the risk of slipping into uncontrollable escalation increases.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">The empty space in the unmade photo in Atlanta is neither a victory nor a defeat for any side. It is a diagnosis of an international system that is increasingly failing to meet its own purpose: to talk while people are alive and to work towards ensuring they can continue to live.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">© lesnoy, LifeArmy.org</p><p>Original: <a href="https://lifearmy.org/articles/g20-without-a-group-photo-diplomacy-on-the-edge-of-ritual">https://lifearmy.org/articles/g20-without-a-group-photo-diplomacy-on-the-edge-of-ritual</a></p>

1 2 3 4 5 Views: 1 | Added by: lesnoy | Rating: 0.0/0

Total comments: 0